A jazz musician declined to perform. Richard Grenell threatened to seek $1 million in damages. Months later, the Kennedy Center was ordered to cover more than a quarter of a million dollars in the musician’s legal expenses.
The dispute involving Chuck Redd became a striking example of what can happen when an artist’s public objection turns into a courtroom battle.
The case was dismissed in June 2026. A subsequent August order added a substantial legal bill for the centre, which said it intended to appeal.

A familiar performer makes a different choice
Redd had led the Kennedy Center’s free Christmas Eve Jazz Jam from 2006 to 2024, according to DownBeat’s reporting. In December 2025, he withdrew after the institution’s board added Donald Trump’s name to the venue.
This was an established musician stepping away from a longstanding engagement. As his official biography details, Redd’s career includes performing with Charlie Byrd, Mel Tormé and Dizzy Gillespie. He has also recorded with his brother, pianist Robert Redd.

Grenell, the gay Trump ally who was then the centre’s president, described the withdrawal as a political stunt and threatened a $1 million damages claim. The Kennedy Center subsequently sued Redd for breach of contract.
The agreement at the centre of the dispute
Redd had not signed the proposed performance agreement. The centre nevertheless argued that he had agreed to perform.
On June 5, D.C. Superior Court Judge Tanya M. Jones Bosier dismissed the case. Redd’s lawyers at Katz Banks Kumin confirmed that the court granted his motion under the District’s anti-SLAPP law, which protects participation in public debate against lawsuits seeking to silence it.
Attorney Lisa J. Banks characterised the lawsuit as political retaliation. That is the position of Redd’s legal team; the court’s dismissal and subsequent fee award are the documented outcomes.
The bill that followed
In its August 10 order, the court directed the Kennedy Center to pay Redd’s lawyers $252,479.70 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
The amount covered the expense of defending the case. It was not a damages award against Grenell personally.
NPR reported that the Kennedy Center intended to appeal. These rulings should therefore be understood as the June and August decisions, rather than confirmation that every possible challenge has ended.
For anyone who values artists’ freedom to speak, the human stakes are easy to recognise. Turning down a performance became a legal fight requiring substantial resources. The fee order meant the court placed those defence costs on the institution that brought the unsuccessful case.
📷 Redd











