Colorado lawmakers have approved a rewritten conversion therapy ban only weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state’s previous law.
The new legislation represents a rapid attempt to preserve protections for LGBTQ+ youth while adapting to the legal concerns raised by the Court, Advocate reports.
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado’s previous law likely violated First Amendment protections related to speech between therapists and minors.
The original law prohibited licensed mental health professionals from attempting to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity through talk therapy.
The Court’s ruling did not endorse conversion therapy itself.
Instead, the majority argued that the law regulated speech based on viewpoint, triggering heightened constitutional scrutiny.
That decision immediately raised concerns among LGBTQ+ advocates, mental health professionals, and lawmakers in states with similar bans.
Colorado’s response has been to rewrite the law in a more “viewpoint-neutral” way.
The updated legislation no longer prohibits counseling in one specific ideological direction.
Instead, it bars licensed therapists from imposing any predetermined outcome regarding a young person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
Supporters of the bill argue that the revised wording better aligns with the Supreme Court’s reasoning while still protecting minors from coercive therapeutic practices.
Major medical and psychological organizations have repeatedly criticized conversion therapy, describing it as ineffective and potentially harmful.
Research has linked the practice to increased risks of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among LGBTQ+ youth.
Critics of the new law, however, argue that it may still face constitutional challenges.
Some opponents believe the revised language continues to regulate conversations between therapists and patients in ways that implicate free speech rights.
The debate reflects a broader national conflict over LGBTQ+ protections, religious freedom claims, and the role of states in regulating mental health practices.
Colorado’s rapid legislative response has drawn particular attention because it signals a willingness to continue defending protections for LGBTQ+ minors even after a major Supreme Court setback.
For supporters, the move sends a broader message about political priorities.
It reflects an effort to maintain safeguards for vulnerable young people during a period of growing legal and political pressure on LGBTQ+ rights across the United States.
Whether the rewritten law ultimately survives future legal challenges remains uncertain.
But the speed and determination behind its passage have already made it a significant moment in the ongoing national debate surrounding conversion therapy and LGBTQ+ youth protections.
For those who want a deeper look at the realities behind conversion therapy, “Conversion Therapy Dropout” offers a firsthand perspective.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.











