Wyoming congressional candidate Reid Rasner says he never expected his own sexuality to become a political weapon.

The openly gay Republican has filed lawsuits alleging that political opponents spread false and defamatory claims about him during his campaigns.

According to the lawsuits, he was falsely described as a pedophile and subjected to other personal attacks (LGBTQ Nation).

Rasner also says internal campaign polling highlighted the fact that he had “married his gay husband in New York” and suggested that the information hurt his standing with Republican primary voters.

The allegations have attracted attention because Rasner has spent much of his political career supporting conservative positions on LGBTQ+ issues.

He has publicly opposed gender-affirming care for transgender minors and has aligned himself with several Republican culture-war initiatives.

Those positions, however, did not prevent him from becoming the target of anti-gay rhetoric from within his own political party, according to his account.

Rasner argues that the attacks crossed the line from political disagreement into defamatory personal smears.

The lawsuits remain civil claims, and the allegations have not been proven in court.

The episode has sparked discussion across LGBTQ+ media because it reflects a familiar political dynamic often summarized by the phrase “leopards ate my face.”

The expression describes situations in which people are harmed by movements or policies they previously supported or believed would affect only others.

Supporters of Rasner argue that nobody deserves to be targeted because of their sexual orientation regardless of political affiliation.

Critics, meanwhile, see the controversy as highlighting the risks of participating in political movements that have frequently opposed LGBTQ+ rights.

Whatever perspective readers bring to the story, it demonstrates that prejudice can sometimes reach beyond the groups it was originally directed toward.

As the legal proceedings continue, Rasner’s allegations have become another example of the complicated relationship between identity and modern American politics.

Connor Storrie has officially become an Emmy nominee after receiving his first Primetime Emmy nomination for hosting Saturday Night Live.

The nomination comes less than a year after his career was transformed by his starring role as Ilya Rozanov in the hit queer hockey drama Heated Rivalry.

Storrie was nominated in the Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series category for his February appearance as host of NBC’s long-running sketch show.

The recognition marks another major milestone for the 26-year-old actor, whose popularity has grown rapidly over the past year.

Many fans had hoped to see Heated Rivalry recognised by the Television Academy.

However, the series was never eligible for Primetime Emmy consideration because it is a Canadian production that does not meet the Academy’s U.S. co-production requirements.

Although HBO Max distributes the series in the United States, the platform joined after production had already been completed.

That technicality prevented both the show and its performances from competing in the main Emmy categories.

Even so, Heated Rivalry has earned widespread critical acclaim and a passionate international fanbase.

Storrie’s portrayal of professional hockey player Ilya Rozanov has been widely praised for its emotional depth, vulnerability and chemistry with co-star Hudson Williams.

The series has also received recognition outside the competitive Emmy race, including honours celebrating television that promotes positive social change.

Storrie’s successful turn as Saturday Night Live host demonstrated another side of his talent.

His performance showcased comic timing and confidence that impressed critics and audiences alike.

The Emmy nomination now places him alongside some of television’s most respected performers.

For LGBTQ+ audiences who discovered him through Heated Rivalry, the nomination feels like another chapter in an extraordinary rise.

While many fans will continue hoping that Heated Rivalry eventually becomes eligible for Emmy competition, Storrie’s first nomination is a reminder that outstanding performances often find recognition in unexpected ways.

📷 @nbcsnl

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom

A Republican congressional candidate in Florida has gone viral for trying to use giraffes to argue that people cannot be born gay.

The problem is that giraffes are one of the most frequently cited animals in discussions of same-sex behavior in nature.

Rod Joseph made the comments during an interview with the South Florida Sun Sentinel editorial board while speaking alongside other Republican candidates running for Florida’s 20th Congressional District.

According to LGBTQ Nation, Joseph said that everyone is “born straight” and claimed that people do not see male giraffes mating with other male giraffes.

He then used the example to argue that sexual orientation is a preference rather than a biological orientation.

The comments came after the candidates were asked about anti-LGBTQ remarks made by Republican U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee.

Joseph declined to directly address Ogles’ statement before shifting into his own claims about sexuality, nature and animals.

His argument quickly drew attention because the animal he chose is an especially awkward example.

Researchers have documented same-sex sexual behavior in more than 1,500 animal species across many parts of the animal kingdom.

That does not mean scientists generally describe animals as gay, lesbian or bisexual in the same way humans use those words.

Scientists more often refer to same-sex sexual behavior, courtship behavior or affiliative behavior because human sexual identity carries cultural meanings that do not translate neatly to non-human animals.

Still, giraffes have long been discussed as one of the clearest and most memorable examples.

Male giraffes have been observed engaging in necking, nuzzling, courtship behavior and mounting with other males.

Some research and later summaries have found that male-male mounting made up the overwhelming majority of observed mounting behavior among giraffes in certain studies.

That statistic is sometimes simplified online into the claim that “most giraffes are gay,” which is not scientifically precise.

The more accurate point is that same-sex sexual behavior among male giraffes has been repeatedly observed and is a recognized part of giraffe behavior.

That makes Joseph’s example less a scientific argument than a reminder of how risky it can be to use nature as a political talking point without checking the biology first.

Animal behavior also should not be treated as the foundation for human rights.

LGBTQ+ people do not need giraffes, penguins or lions to prove that their lives deserve dignity, safety and equal treatment.

But when politicians claim same-sex attraction is absent from nature, the scientific record says otherwise.

In this case, the giraffes may have made the argument better than any political opponent could.

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom