James Dale Fought Gay Exclusion From The Scouts, Now He Is Defending Trans Kids

James Dale knows what it feels like to have an organization that shaped your childhood suddenly declare that you do not belong.

Dale joined the Boy Scouts when he was eight years old and eventually earned the rank of Eagle Scout.

In 1990, when he was 19 and serving as an assistant scoutmaster, the organization expelled him after a newspaper article identified him as gay (LGBTQ Nation).

He challenged the decision in a legal battle that eventually reached the United States Supreme Court.

New Jersey’s highest court initially ruled that the Scouts had violated the state’s anti-discrimination law.

The national organization appealed, arguing that forcing it to accept an openly gay leader would interfere with its constitutional freedom of association.

In 2000, the Supreme Court agreed in a narrow 5–4 decision known as Boy Scouts of America v. Dale.

The ruling established that a private expressive organization could exclude someone when that person’s presence significantly affected the message the organization claimed to express.

For Dale, the judgment meant losing the case after nearly a decade of litigation.

The Scouts later reversed their exclusionary policies, allowing openly gay youth in 2013 and openly gay adult leaders in 2015.

The organization, now called Scouting America, has also admitted girls and said that transgender young people may participate.

Those changes have placed the organization in the sights of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Hegseth threatened to withdraw the Pentagon’s longstanding support unless Scouting America abandoned diversity initiatives and returned to what he described as its traditional mission.

The military has historically provided logistical assistance for major Scout events, including access to bases, transportation and support for the National Jamboree.

Scouting America and the Pentagon reached an agreement in February 2026 that allowed that partnership to continue.

However, the two sides publicly described the agreement in very different terms.

Hegseth claimed that membership would be determined by biological sex at birth and that the organization had agreed to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

Scouting America disputed the suggestion that transgender members had been banned.

Its chief executive, Roger Krone, said transgender people remained in the program and would continue to be welcome.

The contradiction left families, volunteers and advocates uncertain about what the organization had actually promised.

Dale has now filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit demanding that the Department of Defense release the agreement.

He argues that the public has a right to know whether the government pressured a private youth organization into discriminating against transgender children.

The legal irony is impossible to miss.

The Supreme Court ruling that once allowed the Scouts to exclude Dale may now protect Scouting America from government pressure to exclude others.

Dale says the principle of expressive association belongs to the organization itself rather than whichever administration currently controls federal resources.

If Scouting America has chosen inclusion as part of its identity and message, the government should not be permitted to force it in the opposite direction.

The controversy is no longer theoretical.

At the 2026 National Jamboree in West Virginia, Scouting America removed dedicated inclusion spaces previously created for LGBTQ+ scouts, girls and scouts of color.

The organization said it remained committed to serving all young people, but the changes followed months of Pentagon pressure over what Hegseth called “woke” policies.

Some scouts and volunteers decided not to attend after the inclusion programs were eliminated.

Others attended while wearing Pride symbols so vulnerable young people would still know that supportive adults were present.

Dale sees a direct connection between his experience and what transgender scouts are facing now.

He was not expelled because he failed to live by the values of scouting.

He was expelled because leaders decided that being gay made him incompatible with those values.

Transgender young people are now hearing variations of the same argument.

Supporters of exclusion insist they are protecting tradition, while those affected are told that their identities make them unsuitable for full participation.

Dale has also offered support to transgender plaintiffs in other legal battles, arguing that people who have experienced institutional rejection have a responsibility to stand beside those facing it next.

His campaign is therefore larger than a request for one government document.

It asks whether federal power can be used to make private organizations less inclusive while hiding the precise terms of the arrangement from the public.

It also asks whether the painful history of gay exclusion in scouting will become a lesson or simply a template applied to another group.

James Dale spent years trying to prove that gay people belonged in the Scouts.

More than three decades later, he is still defending the same basic principle.

A young person should not lose community, opportunity or dignity simply because someone in power has decided that their identity does not belong.

📷 @jamesrdale

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom

Drake Von Arrested For The Third Time In Less Than Two Months

0

Gay adult performer Drake Von has reportedly been arrested for the third time since the beginning of June.

The latest incident occurred in Los Angeles on Tuesday night.

Von, whose legal name is Dawson Bacon, was booked into the Los Angeles Police Department’s Van Nuys jail.

TMZ reports that he was arrested on suspicion of misdemeanor possession of a substance similar to toluene.

Toluene is a colourless solvent that can be highly toxic when inhaled and may cause dizziness and other serious effects.

Police told TMZ that officers responded to a call concerning two men allegedly using narcotics on the street.

Von was taken into custody when officers arrived.

The second man was not arrested.

Jail records reportedly show that Von was released on Wednesday on his own recognizance.

That means he was released without posting bail after agreeing to return for future court proceedings.

No conviction has resulted from the new arrest.

Von had not publicly commented on the latest allegations when TMZ published its report.

The arrest adds to a series of serious legal incidents involving the performer during the previous two months.

Von was arrested in Las Vegas in early June following an alleged domestic-violence incident involving his female partner.

Police alleged that an argument escalated into physical violence.

According to reports describing the police account, Von allegedly grabbed the woman by the throat, forced her to the ground and restricted her breathing.

The woman reportedly told officers that she could not breathe and believed she briefly lost consciousness.

Police also documented injuries they said were consistent with her account.

Von was charged with domestic battery by strangulation and coercion constituting domestic violence with threat or use of physical force, both felonies.

He was additionally charged with misdemeanor domestic battery.

Von was later released after posting a bond of more than $25,000.

He has denied the domestic-violence allegations.

Von told TMZ that the claims were false and said the case would eventually be dismissed.

He also described the incident as a misunderstanding and a publicity stunt.

Those statements represent Von’s position rather than the findings of a court.

The criminal charges remain allegations unless and until prosecutors establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Later in June, Von was arrested again following a vehicle collision in Las Vegas.

He was booked on suspicion of misdemeanor driving under the influence.

Police said his Tesla collided with another vehicle after pulling out of a parking area.

Those involved in the crash were reportedly taken to hospital.

A witness allegedly told officers that Von appeared slumped over the steering wheel before the collision.

When police later spoke with him at the hospital, officers said his eyes appeared glossy.

Von denied drinking alcohol or using marijuana or illegal drugs before driving.

A police report obtained by TMZ said officers found 13 nitrous-oxide tanks inside the Tesla.

The reported items included several large tanks, smaller containers, balloons and rubber bands.

Von allegedly told officers that he had previously used nitrous oxide but not during the month of the crash.

Police obtained a warrant for a blood sample after he declined to provide one voluntarily.

Authorities also requested testing for inhalants.

No publicly reported conviction has resulted from that DUI arrest.

The Los Angeles case is separate from both the domestic-violence prosecution and the DUI matter in Nevada.

Each incident will be handled according to its own evidence, charges and court process.

It would therefore be inaccurate to combine the three arrests into a single finding of guilt.

What can be said is that three arrests within such a brief period form a deeply concerning pattern around a 23-year-old performer with a large online audience.

Von has worked in gay adult entertainment since he was 18 and has received multiple GayVN Award nominations.

He won two fan-voted categories at the 2024 awards and has built a following through adult films and social media.

His latest arrest is likely to intensify attention on both the unresolved criminal allegations and his public response to them.

For now, Von has been arrested and released, not convicted in the new Los Angeles case.

The legal proceedings surrounding all three incidents remain more important than the jokes generated by his increasingly familiar booking history.

📷 @drakevonx

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom

Alan Turing’s Unfinished Gay Story Reveals The Man Behind The Tragedy

0

Alan Turing has often been remembered through two powerful but limiting images: the brilliant mathematician who helped Britain break Nazi codes and the persecuted gay man destroyed by the country he served.

A newly completed transcription of an unfinished story written in Turing’s own hand now reveals a personality that does not fit neatly inside either portrait.

Pryce’s Buoy presents Turing as playful, funny, literary, sexually curious and far less ashamed of his homosexuality than popular retellings have sometimes suggested (Pink News).

The approximately 1,000-word manuscript survives as six handwritten pages in the archives of King’s College, Cambridge.

It has previously been quoted and discussed in part, but Cambridge literature professor Sarah Dillon has now produced the first complete transcription and extended literary study.

The story does not carry a title in Turing’s manuscript and became commonly known as Pryce’s Buoy because of the fictional invention associated with its central character.

Turing transforms himself into Alec Pryce, a successful homosexual scientist whose celebrated invention made his name while he was still a young man.

After completing another piece of scientific work he considers particularly important, Alec decides that he has earned some pleasure and goes looking for a male companion.

He encounters Ron Miller, a younger working-class man hoping to make money, and the narration moves between the thoughts of the two men as they cautiously assess one another.

The scene captures the uncertainty surrounding gay encounters at a time when consensual sex between men remained a criminal offence in Britain.

It also presents desire without apology, allowing Alec to experience attraction, self-consciousness, humour and growing comfort in another man’s company.

Dillon argues that the manuscript disrupts the two-dimensional version of Turing as a socially unaware scientist concerned only with logic and numbers.

She instead describes the writer who emerges from the pages as playful, cheeky and someone who enjoyed sex.

The story appears to be a fictionalized account of Turing’s first encounter with Arnold Murray in Manchester near the end of 1951.

Turing met Murray shortly after submitting his landmark scientific paper on morphogenesis, matching the sequence of events described through Alec Pryce.

Their relationship later became known to police after Turing reported a burglary at his home.

During the investigation, Turing openly acknowledged having a sexual relationship with Murray.

Both men were prosecuted for “gross indecency,” the same legal category used against generations of gay and bisexual men.

Turing pleaded guilty in 1952 and accepted probation that required hormonal treatment rather than imprisonment.

The estrogen treatment has frequently been described as chemical castration because of its intention and physical effects.

Turing died from cyanide poisoning in June 1954 at the age of 41, and the official inquest concluded that he had taken his own life.

The short story was probably written while he was attempting to understand what the arrest, prosecution and punishment had done to him.

In a letter written shortly before pleading guilty, Turing told his friend Norman Routledge that the strange story of how his sexuality had been discovered deserved to become a short story one day.

He also wondered what kind of person would emerge from the experience.

Dillon reads Pryce’s Buoy as part of that process of self-exploration.

Turing had always been an enthusiastic reader, including of literature dealing openly or indirectly with gay men and their social worlds.

The new study identifies a particular influence from Angus Wilson’s 1952 novel Hemlock and After, which portrayed homosexual desire, class and the largely hidden communities through which men found one another.

By turning his own experience into fiction, Turing could step outside himself and explore the encounter from both men’s perspectives.

The result is not simply confession but a glimpse of gay life in post-war England written for readers capable of recognizing that world.

It also matters because the manuscript refuses to let Turing’s sexuality appear only as the source of his suffering.

His desire is dangerous because society and the law made it dangerous, but it is not portrayed as inherently tragic.

Alec is interested in men, knows what he wants and enjoys discussing or displaying his homosexuality in company he considers appropriate.

The document therefore returns humour, eroticism and agency to a historical figure whose sexuality is too often mentioned only when describing his punishment and death.

The surviving manuscript ends abruptly at the bottom of its sixth page and in the middle of a sentence.

Its physical condition suggests that Turing probably continued writing but that the remaining pages were lost, removed or never preserved.

Dillon has questioned whether the missing section became more sexually explicit and whether someone within Turing’s family might later have censored it, although no evidence currently proves what happened.

The British government formally apologized for Turing’s treatment in 2009, and Queen Elizabeth II granted him a posthumous pardon in 2013.

Legislation commonly known as Turing’s Law later extended pardons to thousands of other men convicted under abolished laws criminalizing consensual same-sex activity.

Those acts recognized an injustice, but they could not return the years, careers and lives damaged by the law.

The new reading of Pryce’s Buoy offers a different kind of restoration.

It reminds us that Alan Turing was not only a genius, a victim or a symbol, but a complicated gay man who read, joked, desired and tried to write himself through an experience designed to shame him.

📷 AI

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom

A Gay Couple Was Warned For Kissing At A Bogotá Mall, So The Community Kissed Back

A brief kiss between two young men inside one of Bogotá’s most prominent shopping centres has become the centre of a wider debate about discrimination and who is permitted to show affection in public.

Rodri Bastidas and his boyfriend Jhoan Loaiza were eating together in the food court at Centro Comercial Andino on July 19.

After finishing their meal, they decided to record a short TikTok video involving a kiss and a turn toward the camera (infobae).

According to their account, a security guard approached while they were filming and told them that they could not display that kind of affection inside the shopping centre.

The couple said the guard referred to children being nearby and warned that they could be removed if they kissed again.

Rodri and Jhoan said their behaviour consisted of nothing more than an ordinary kiss.

The conversation with the guard was recorded from a distance by another shopper who had witnessed what happened.

She later approached the couple, asked whether they had been subjected to discrimination and shared the recording with them.

The video spread rapidly across social media after Rodri posted it and questioned whether a heterosexual couple would have received the same warning.

Some viewers initially suggested that the encounter had been staged because someone happened to be filming it.

The couple explained that the witness began recording after noticing the security guard approaching them and that she was not involved in their TikTok video.

Centro Comercial Andino opened a review of the incident after the footage attracted widespread criticism.

The mall later concluded that the couple had not engaged in any conduct that justified the security guard’s intervention.

Its management publicly apologized to Rodri and Jhoan and said it had contacted them directly.

The mall also announced that it would review its procedures, examine the conduct of its private security provider and reinforce staff training on inclusion, diversity and respectful treatment.

Securitas Colombia, the company employing the security guard, issued a separate apology.

The company said it had opened an internal investigation and would consider corrective measures once that process had been completed.

Securitas emphasized that dignity, equal treatment and freedom from discrimination were part of its stated institutional policies.

No public finding has yet established the individual guard’s legal responsibility, and the internal investigation remains separate from any criminal process.

Rodri and Jhoan nevertheless decided that an apology should not be the end of the matter.

With assistance from human rights attorney Alejandro Michells, they filed a complaint with Colombia’s Attorney General’s Office alleging discrimination.

The filing asks authorities to investigate what occurred and determine whether anyone committed an offence under Colombian law.

No person has been charged or convicted in connection with the incident.

Bogotá’s Unit Against Discrimination also contacted the couple and offered legal guidance and psychosocial support.

The public response soon moved beyond statements and social media posts.

Activists organized a “besatón,” or kiss-in, at the shopping centre on July 22.

Dozens of LGBTQ+ people, couples, allies and political representatives attended the peaceful demonstration.

Participants kissed, held hands and gathered beneath messages asserting that affection should not be treated differently according to the genders of the people expressing it.

The location carried uncomfortable historical significance because Centro Comercial Andino had faced a similar controversy in 2019.

That earlier incident involved gay couple Esteban Miranda and Nicolás Téllez, who were accused by another visitor of behaving obscenely near children.

Security recordings reportedly contradicted the accusation, while a police citation issued to the couple was later annulled after authorities found problems with the procedure.

Approximately 800 people responded by gathering outside the shopping centre beneath the message that kisses are affection rather than a crime.

Colombia’s Constitutional Court has separately ruled that removing a same-sex couple from a shopping centre because of public affection can constitute discrimination.

The court stated that same-sex and different-sex couples must be treated equally when displaying affection under comparable circumstances.

Colombia’s anti-discrimination law also provides criminal penalties for certain acts that arbitrarily restrict people’s rights because of characteristics including sexual orientation.

Whether the Bogotá incident meets that criminal threshold is now a matter for investigators rather than social media.

The mall’s own conclusion is already much clearer.

Rodri and Jhoan had done nothing that warranted the warning they received.

A kiss does not become more sexual, more dangerous or less appropriate simply because it is shared by two men.

The community’s response offered an equally clear answer by returning to the same location and filling it with the affection that had been challenged.

📷 @rodribastidass / @flwer.jhonxx

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom

Kim Davis Accused Of Moving Assets To Avoid Paying Gay Couple

More than a decade after Kim Davis denied two Kentucky men a marriage licence, their legal battle has moved from the county clerk’s office to property records and inheritance law.

David Ermold and David Moore have filed a new lawsuit accusing the former Rowan County clerk of transferring inherited assets to relatives and a family trust to prevent the couple from collecting money she owes them.

The allegations have not yet been decided by a court, and Davis’s attorneys deny that she acted improperly.

The latest complaint was filed in Rowan Circuit Court by attorneys representing Ermold and Moore (Instinct).

The couple became central figures in the national fight over marriage equality after Davis refused to issue them a licence following the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis cited her Apostolic Christian beliefs and stopped her office from issuing marriage licences to any couple rather than approve licences for same-sex couples.

She continued refusing after a federal judge ordered her to comply and ultimately spent several days in jail for contempt of court.

Deputy clerks began issuing licences while Davis was detained, and Ermold and Moore eventually married in October 2015.

Their civil rights lawsuit continued for years after they obtained the licence.

A federal judge ruled in 2022 that Davis had violated their constitutional rights while acting as an elected government official.

A jury awarded the men a combined $100,000 in damages in 2023.

Davis was subsequently ordered to pay more than $260,000 in attorneys’ fees and expenses.

Her appeals argued that the First Amendment should protect her from personal liability because issuing a same-sex marriage licence conflicted with her religious beliefs.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that argument, concluding that constitutional protections for private religious conduct did not allow a public official to deny citizens their rights while performing government duties.

The United States Supreme Court declined to hear Davis’s appeal in November 2025, leaving the lower court decisions and the judgment against her intact.

The current dispute concerns whether Davis later placed assets outside the couple’s reach.

The newly filed complaint alleges that Davis inherited a 50% interest in her mother’s estate in early 2025.

The estate was reportedly valued at approximately $735,230.

Attorneys for Ermold and Moore say county records show that several properties were later transferred to relatives and a family trust.

The assets reportedly included a family home, a farm covering approximately 50 acres and another residence.

The lawsuit says the transfers were made for family affection and without monetary consideration.

The plaintiffs argue that this effectively removed Davis’s ownership while she remained responsible for an unpaid legal judgment.

Their attorneys are asking the court to reverse the transfers under Kentucky’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.

That law permits judges to undo certain transactions if property was moved to hinder, delay or defraud creditors.

It can also apply when assets are transferred without reasonably equivalent value while a debt remains outstanding.

The couple’s legal team says Davis now owes a total of $565,285.91 after additional costs and interest.

Attorney Michael Gartland told reporters that his clients had received only “a penny” from Davis so far.

He described the property records as unusually strong evidence supporting their claim.

Another attorney for the couple, Joseph Buckles, said discovering the transactions required examining probate files and county records.

Davis’s attorneys strongly dispute the accusation that she attempted to conceal property.

Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver, who represents Davis, said she answered deposition questions truthfully because she was asked what property she currently owned rather than what she had previously inherited.

He also said Davis transferred the assets to carry out her late mother’s wishes.

The plaintiffs argue that the probate records do not contain a formal will directing those transfers.

A judge must now decide whether the property changes were ordinary family estate planning or legally voidable transfers designed to frustrate creditors.

The new lawsuit does not reopen the question of whether Davis violated the couple’s constitutional rights.

That issue has already been decided repeatedly in federal court.

It also does not mean the couple has automatically gained ownership of the transferred properties.

They are asking a state court to make those assets available as they attempt to enforce the existing judgment.

The dispute illustrates how a celebrated civil rights victory can still require years of additional litigation before the people who won receive meaningful compensation.

Ermold and Moore obtained their marriage licence in 2015 and later proved that their rights had been violated.

They then defended that judgment through multiple appeals, including Davis’s unsuccessful attempt to bring the case before the Supreme Court and challenge marriage equality itself.

More than ten years after they first walked into the Rowan County clerk’s office, the couple is still asking the courts to ensure that its decisions carry consequences.

The licence was eventually issued, the constitutional violation was established and the damages were awarded, but the final payment remains another legal battle entirely.

📷 David Ermold

🎬 Prefer video? Subscribe to B-Gay on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@BGaycom